tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5078287126930176141.post1793258111767803352..comments2023-10-08T07:26:48.367-07:00Comments on When Carcajous Attack!: J'accuseMarkushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07599907559645474571noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5078287126930176141.post-28869097331145642402009-08-30T17:03:58.805-07:002009-08-30T17:03:58.805-07:00No basis for any of it. It's a combination of ...No basis for any of it. It's a combination of willful ignorance on the part of the reporters who apparently made no attempt to seek out an authoritative reading of the NCAA guidelines, but rather simply read them and decided what they mean for themselves. There is only one applicable rule, 17.02.13, section (c). But even that isn't proven, because it's perfectly fine for the graduate assistants to be there and keep attendance records -- they just can't share them (or any other information about the scrimmages) with the coaches. The players in question don't know if that was done and I'd be stunned if it was, since the rule is very clear.<br /><br />Even less basis for the in-season Sundays allegation, which is a misrepresentation of how the team spent those days. Sure, most starters were there for 11 hours or so. But there were treatments and meals. The coaching did not begin until after lunch. There were extra voluntary sessions after dinner for two or at most three hours, and such things are within the rules.Rasmushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17035622310779849421noreply@blogger.com